Interview with Sherif Arafa
Cartoon Movement App Now Available

Hungarian Cartoonists Under Fire from Repressive New Law

Elected last year with a super-majority in Hungary's parliament, the right-wing Fidesz party and Prime Minister Viktor Orban passed a far-reaching media law giving the government broad power to regulate and fine media outlets it deems unbalanced. Hungarian newspapers printed blank front pages in protest and an international outcry soon followed.

Under the law, massive fines can be levied at news outlets for unbalanced reporting and offenses to "human dignity" and "public morality." Who has crossed the line of these incredibly fuzzy terms will be determined by the Media Council, composed entirely of members of the governing Fidesz party, who have already launched an inquiry into the left-liberal broadcaster Tilos Radio for playing a song from rapper Ice-T said to adversely effect the welfare of children.

While the EU declared the law as antithetical to its values, Hungary began its six-month term as rotating presidency of the European Union. Under pressure from the European Commission, Budapest revised some of the provisions, exempting reporters from foreign news outlets and blogs from mandatory balance in their coverage. These mostly cosmetic changes seemed to have dampened the EU uproar while keeping the core of the law intact for broadcasters and newspapers within the country.

I talked with three Hungarian editorial cartoonists and illustrators--Gábor Pápai, Joe Békési, and Péter Zsoldos--about how the media law will affect their work.

Matt Bors: The implications of this law are frightening if fully implemented. Assaulting the "human dignity" of politicians is what editorial cartoonists do for a living. How might this new media law effect cartoons?

Hungarian1 Gábor Pápai: The consequences of the law are scary indeed. However, we did get unexpectedly strong support from the European Union. This can keep those in power from the abusing it for a while, but I fear they will use it against us once the EU presidency is over. I have a feeling, like when the abusive head of family is busy nodding to the policeman’s warning, but he can’t wait for the door to close so he can remain with his family. Regretfully the EU is not going in the direction of a federal union that I would prefer.

Joe Békési:  This law is not dangerous to specific individuals, but editorial offices, publishing houses, and television channels that can be ruined or forced to continually self-censor. It will kill investigative journalism.

Péter Zsoldos: Since most of my work is caricatures, I would be strongly affected. I find those parts of the law specially alarming that give the right of deciding whether the content has been against the rules after the publication of the item. The trick is that the rules are flexible and all this is up to the Media Authority to decide what they find unbalanced.

Hungarian5 They have the right to impose fines which must be paid, if the court doesn’t annul it, within thirty days. Knowing how the Hungarian courts work, these decisions will take years. The Media Authority’s political composition is also alarming, as it was proposed and voted by the governing party, excluding the other parties from proposing candidates.

Bors: What kind of restrictions--legally or editorially--are already placed on editorial cartoonists? Have you enjoyed a good deal of freedom to go after who and what you wanted? There are always editors afraid to rock the boat, but I wonder most about politicians. Have they felt content to throw their weight around before in restricting a free press?

Hungarian3 Zsoldos: Until now, theoretically we had total freedom. And seldom did any official retribution happen. I must say, however, that there were many cases when after a caricature of an influential public figure was published, the paper suddenly stopped asking me for drawings. My colleague Fenekovács László had a caricature for which his paper was severely fined by the court for hurting privacy rights.

Békési: The promise of incredibly high fines for elusive things keeps editors from attacking power. The same applies for cartoonists. As you mentioned, they will fear rocking the boat. At the end of the eighties I had a little illegal print shop where I made leaflets and so on so I was feeling personally what I am speaking about. Now we went back into the past with that law. Lawmakers hope the terror of the high fines will enhance self-restrictions. It is a great trick of lawmakers that they want to use it after June when they'll be over the rotating presidency. Up to this date I don't know about any penalties.

Hungarian6 Pápai: Although I have been drawing political caricatures daily for the last two decades, I never encountered any ban or expectations of a political nature. We did have hostile acquisitions at some of the papers where I was published, but in those cases I simply walked to other papers. I can proudly say that I could always draw whatever I wanted.

Bors: Could you describe the state of editorial cartooning in Hungary. Is there much oppositional or hard-hitting work? Do media figures and politicians in Hungary take note of this work and it is seen as important to the general public?

Zsoldos: The Hungarian caricaturists are just as divided politically as our society. But basically we are free. It is mostly the publishers who tell you how far you can go with a caricature.

Pápai: Very few people are doing political caricature in Hungary. Most of these are now in the opposition, which can frustrate those in power. Politicians haven’t given opinions on my drawings directly, but the right-wing media, which is supportive of the present government, often attacks my work.

The deputy editor-in-chief of Magyar Hírlap, who I used to work for before it changed its political direction, compared my work to the Mohammed-cartoons, and he did not conceal that he sympathized with those who issue fatwas. In this article he incited violence against me. People commenting there publicized my personal data and address.

Another newspaper close to the government, Magyar Nemzet asked how long I will be allowed to depict the Prime Minister in a bad light. This is before the new media law. Because of all this I feel like these drawings are gaining importance, and drawing more and more attention.
Bors: How are your colleges at newspapers who work as reporters and editors taking this? Is this seen as an outrageous overreach that will be reversed or only the beginning of  a more long-lasting and further reaching campaign against a free press.

Békési: That is the fear and it is a very bad example in the EU.
Pápai: Around me most people feel that they are in this for the long haul, and that the government will exert a total control of public speech. This, however, is destined to fail, and even if their plans for a single-party constitution materialize, the quickly eroding power will be followed by a first constitutional amendment, which will be about freedom of speech in Hungary too.

Zsoldos:  On public radio, Mong Attila and the editor of the program were immediately sacked  because they protested the media law with a minute of silence. This is definitely an abuse, especially because the law will be in force only after June 1st, after the end of the EU presidency. And this sacking was decided not by the media authority, but by the leadership of the radio. Since then  several Facebook groups have been created to protest this decision online, and in street demonstrations as well.

Hungarian2 Bors: Will this law and its potential consequences change anything about what you do?

Békési: No, I don’t think so. I retired.

Zsoldos: It will definitely influence my publishing possibilities. The law threatens such high fines that it could immediately lead a paper into bankruptcy. Also, the “flexibility” of the law makes it impossible to decide what is unbiased. Compared to this situation, it would be even better if we had a censor at each company: this way at least we would know what is allowed and what is not.

Pápai: I don’t think it can stop my work. The main part of the work will be moved to the Internet. I might even have to work from abroad for a Hungarian audience. Marx says this about destructive power: the shoe cannot stop the growth of the foot, it can only distort it.


Gábor Pápai is the cartoonist for Népszava in Budapest. Joe Békési served as president of the Hungarian Cartoonist Association. He began cartooning in the late 1980s as part of the underground Sumizdat movement. Péter Zsoldos works a cartoonist and caricaturist for various publications in and outside of Hungary.


The interviews were conducted separately and edited for length. A special thanks to Tibor Várady, Veronika Kozma, and Redjade for translating.

Image credits: Zsoldos self-portrait, Békési self-potrait, Pápai on the Victor Orbán, Békési on the EU, Pápai on Gaddafi, Zsoldos on the media law. All images © their respective creators.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Agh Tamasne

Only in the first 2 paragraph I have found 3 serious "mistakes" (lies?) - even if it is just repetition of other's lie, it is still a lie.
1. Unbalanced content: actually it is a double lie -
a) Unbalanced content cannot be fined, only the Media Council can declare a news service unbalanced, but no fines.
b) And this is the KEY POINT: this requirement is in place for 14 years in Hungary (haha!!!), a law by a Socialist government in 1997. Unbalanced provision of news is thus part of Hungarian legislation and constitutional court case for long. By the way just as in many other countries.
2. "Under the law, massive fines can be levied at news outlets for unbalanced reporting" - not true, unbalanced news cannot be fined.
3. "fuzzy terms" - terms like Human dignity and morality are not fuzzy, are very well defined by court and constitutional court regulations and precedences - AS ALL RULES OF THE MEDIA COUNCIL can be challenged at court.
4. The Tilos Radio investigation is wrong again - as the inquiry started in December, THEREFORE BEFORE THE NEW MEDIA LAW!
5. "EU declared the law as antithetical to its values" - EU never said that, maybe you mix EU for your comrades. Actually after lengthy discussions and analysis the "EU" proposed 4 changes, which were accepted today in parliament. None of those you refer to where among those. In the same time the commissioner said another 10-12 countries' media law have similar challenges.

Very biased article, very obvious.

Cartoon Movement

There are no "lies" here.

Words like "human decency" are fuzzy and violations will be determined by a stacked and biased council. Much of the criticism from around the world has focused on that aspect of the law. It's true that other European countries do mandate balanced coverage, but I never said otherwise.

EU countries, particularly France and Germany, did indeed criticize the law which is the entire reason revisions were submitted.

The Wall Street Journal and many other news outlets noted how they failed to define standards:

The Telegraph and many other news outlets reported on the fines for "balanced" reporting, writing the Media Council's powers give it "tight control of state media and court powers to rule, including the levy of fines, on questions of editorial balance."

Columbia Missourian also reports on the requirement of "balance":

Here's more reporting on it: "The law, which seeks to introduce "balance" into reporting, and which includes heavy financial penalties for non-compliance"

Slate: "A new, state-run media council, composed entirely of Fidesz appointees, now has the right to impose fines of up to $1 million for journalism it considers "unbalanced," whatever that means."

Euronews reported along with many other outlets reported that Tilos Radio is being pursued under the law, which passed late last year.

As for bias, we unapologetically oppose this law and all efforts to stifle free speech everywhere. This isn't an unbiased news article--it's an interview with artists who are facing government censorship. But your comments betray a bias of your own, along with an inability to use Google.

--Matt Bors


(MAr 8 2011)

'Despite adjustments, Hungary's media law continues to violate OSCE commitments, says OSCE representative on freedom of the media'

'The amendments narrow the scope of the law so it no longer covers on-demand services such as Internet sites or blogs. It also limits potential action against foreign media reporting from Hungary.

Registration with the authorities will no longer be a prerequisite for media operations, and a ban on offensive content has also been softened.

The law came into effect on January 1, the same day Hungary took over the rotating six-month presidency of the EU. It has loomed large over Budapest's leadership of the bloc, focusing more attention than usual on the country of around 10 million.'

Agh Tamasne

Dear Matt,
You are citing other articles from other media, but that doesn't make the statements you make in the beginning of your report true. I understand that you think it is true, because you have read it (with the help of Google) in other articles. But still - those are not true! really.

The law is probably not faultless, but you make a big mistake by repeating untrue statements.

One of the reason the widespread criticism of the law did not hurt much the governing party is because it could point out how much of the criticism is unfounded, or simple lies.

One nice example is the potential to fine unbalanced news coverage, which again - not in the law! Or that "human dignity" and "public morality" is any novelty - actually it comes from the old media law, accepted by a social-liberal coalition in 1997.


Unfortunately, Agh Tamasne, what you say here is pure lie.

The law, as published today on the web site of the media authority includes a whole section with a single pragraph denoted 181. § that lays down the procedures the authority is entitled to follow, would it identify a given media stream unbalanced. Therein it makes reference to paragraphs 186-189. §, where corrective and punitive actions, including as last resort, the imposition of fines are settled.

Some of the problems related to the exigence of balanced news coverage may be dampened by fixes made to fulfill (insufficient, but welcome and not negligible) EU exigences, but the media law as a whole remains problematic, not to talk about how unbalanced its application may be expected, as with or without the help of the law proper, by pure force, the ruling "Orbán-FIDESZ coalition" has managed to reach unprecedented unbalance in their favour of news coverage in public media as well as self-alignment of major private TV channels, just to name a few.

You need not action the treats outlined (or not) in a law, to achieve this: fear does the rest of the job and current rulers of Hungary do everything possible to reinforce fear in everyone not submitting or silencing itself to their requirements. After 20 years of freedom we are confronted again with a political power accepting not less than full dominance of public, and through very uncincerely touted "christian" values', also private life of citizens.

Agh Tamasne

Dear bolivar,
I admire your self confidence.
This whole conversation I will make public in Hungary, so all see how poorly informed you all are.
Let me quote 181. § referring to 186-189. §: "In addition to the foregoing, no legal consequences as defined in Articles 186–187 may be applied against the breaching entity."
So this is exactly the opposite you try to say... And you called me a liar... haha.
Good night.

Agh Tamasne

By the way - if any doubt here is the law:
official website.

MBT Online

It took us ages to get dressed - we got changed about 3 times before finally settling on a bit of sparkle..."

seo reseller

I can understand the scrutiny he is undergoing. It is because of his depictions that have been a public scandal.


One of best Hungarian cartoons of all times is Gustav. Gustav is developed in 1964., always wears same gray clothes and is full of various human anomalies. Gustav became a well-known character in many Eastern European countries.

Moncler outlet

That's another example of a bureaucrat thinking they know best. If that house were built in another city, the bureaucrats would slap a notice on the structure and say "tear it down".

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)